are some things unknowable tok objects

Keep in mind that the entire purpose of a ToK Exhibition is to show how the objects you've . However, when viewing it through the lens of TOK, it raises questions and prompts thinking about aliens -There are many scientists who has dedicated their lives to search for unearthly creatures, but as far as humans know, we are the only living organisms in the known universe. With the scientific method and increasingly more complex new technologies we discover more and more things about the world around us. What is the relationship between knowledge and culture? This paradox caused quite a lot of consternation amongst mathematicians. Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. The question if there are unknowable things with our current technology is easy to answer - yes, there are, but as it is impossible to predict the future, it is impossible to say whether these things will remain such. His children survived the war and they were reunited in 1946, although most of his extended family were killed by the German occupiers. It is impossible to determine the state of the animal, unless the box is opened and the cat directly observed. Not clear on the point about 'unknowable' you're raising with your second object. The cover of a VHS cassette (remember those?) I have to look at it, and to look at it I have to illuminate it. It is, therefore, important that students identify specific objects to discuss rather than using generic objects and generic images from the internet (p.42). For the second object, when I first showed my teacher, he took out a piece of paper and started creating a mind map as to how different people might view it and the different perspectives that the painting is subject to. You can read the details below. 2- Broadly connecting some regular object with IA prompt is a complete NO-NO. . Our attempts to forecast those events may not only fail to achieve the expected result but also make the whole situation more exaggerated. The same if you double a positive, whole number you get a corresponding even number, so there must be the same number. This brain-hurting theorem was developed by Kurt Gdel. Its fairly easy to argue that there are no uninteresting people: Consider making a list of uninteresting people; one of those people will be the youngest and being the youngest uninteresting person is, itself, interesting so they should be removed from the list. This will assist in justifying the use of the objects to connect well with the Unknowable part of the IA prompt. This belief, if it were to be considered as a way of knowing, would make God be known to the believer. So, consider a set (S, say) of sets that dont contain themselves. It is strongly recommended that the exhibition is based on. Philosophical treasures from the library of the university of oxford (some intriguing objects). With this concept firmly in place; you can reason thus: Suppose you start writing computer programs to generate real numbers, one for each real number. Others argue however, that these experiments simply measure advancement of the brain from which we reason that the being is conscious or not and consciousness isnt measured directly. As it is a requirement of the new syllabus, there was a lot of ambiguity surrounding examples of what would, or wouldnt be considered an acceptable object for students to pick. To put these into context, the smallest of them (the googol) is still much bigger than the number of particles in the universe (around 10^87). In practice, the objects (and IA prompts) should have something to do with the themes you have studied in TOK: either the core theme (knowledge and the knower), or one of the optional themes ( Knowledge and language, religion, technology, indigenous societies or politics ). Amrozi happy in this photo? https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/God_does_not_play_dice_with_the_universe. In what ways do our values affect our acquisition of knowledge? Acknowledgements: the factual features of this web-page are based on the TOK Guide of the 2022 specification. For the exhibition itself, you should try to present the actual object, although for some objects (a church, for example, or an electron microscope), this wont be possible, so an image will do. This subreddit encourages questions, constructive feedback, and the sharing of knowledge and resources among IB students, alumni, and teachers. Do not sell or share my personal information. Things to bear in mind as you choose your exhibition objects: Make sure that your TOK teacher has given you access to all the documents and online material that support the exhibition. It has been said that the problem with peoples perception of the universe is that our brains are only used to dealing with small numbers, short distances and brief periods of time. After all, youve explained that a generic photo from the Internet is not accepted. One of the simpler levels is that a being is aware that it exists. Now customize the name of a clipboard to store your clips. Likewise with speeches, which the student may study in a History or Language and Literature course. When we create a hypothesis that all swans are white, we eliminate the possibility that there might be a black swan. TOK Exhibition The guiding prompt I have selected for the exhibition is : " Are some things Unknowable ?" Object- Pi and infinity sign. When I was at school, we were taught that an atom was like a mini solar system with a sun-like nucleus in the middle with electrons orbiting, and the electrons were like tiny marbles. For these reasons, the knowledge and the knower, both may remain unknown. So in the case of the fossil, and knowledge about the behaviour or skin etc. Unknowable Thing: Will a computer program ever stop? Check out our new YouTube channel HERE, where you can access our webinar videos, and screencasts that will guide you around the site. Faith is the only way to make the existence of a god knowable, but as there are no clear arguments to make one believe, there will always be people claiming they do not believe and therefore do not know. Activate your 30 day free trialto unlock unlimited reading. It is unknowable. But we can prove that even though Chaitin's number exists, we can also prove it is unknowable. This exhibition explores three objects that are by some considered unknowable, but others are tirelessly trying to prove them wrong. Every even number is the sum of two primes.. looks and acts as a fragment of Spielbergs imagination, the possibility that actual aliens planted those ideas into Spielbergs head cannot be completely discarded -Maybe the outer force previously explored are aliens beyond our comprehension -Maybe Jesus is an alien -But are all those things unknowable because of human limitations? By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. The first calculation of Pi was done by Archimedes . Another example which puts our definition of consciousness in question, would be an artificial intelligence that was trained to perfectly mimic human interactions and that is indistinguishable from humans. He told me that if the author was religious, he/she would insist that act was purely miraculous and that any other reason other than God expressing images through her is wrong. It has been confirmed experimentally, that many quantum particles behave this way they have no exact state until observed, with each state having a certain probability, just like the cat. Links to prompt and personal experience There are probably a large variety of different explanations others experienced in different areas of knowledge could come up with, but thatll take up quite a lot of words. The exhibition aims to assess how you can apply TOK concepts to the real world. Unknowable Thing: Whats the smallest positive integer not definable in under eleven words? To paraphrase Carl Sagan, extraordinary courses require extraordinary resources. Instant access to millions of ebooks, audiobooks, magazines, podcasts and more. These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. So, when you choose a prompt, consider how you may be able to relate it to themes such as knowledge and the knower, knowledge and technology etc. Again, why can't we know if she did or did not paint the paintings? It is possible to define truth for one system in a stronger system; but of course, you cant define truth in that stronger system, youd have to move on to a still stronger system and so on, indefinitely searching for the unreachable truth. As for what I think, while for most of my life I have identified as an atheist, Akianes feat is so astonishing in the artistic sense that Im starting to believe there might be a greater force out there. cultures, we may never be able to know the truth. The IB recommends that you choose objects that you have come across within your academic studies, or in your life beyond the classroom (or a combination of both). However, here are a couple of things that might be true, but not provable: A perfect number is a positive, whole number whose divisors add up to itself. Miracle (religious) -Since Akiane herself said that she saw visions of Jesus Christ, followers of the Christianity religion (Christians) consider her feat a miracle, Training, genius (artist) -As mentioned before, eight year olds normally dont have the ability to do this -Others might consider Akiane an artistic prodigy, but might be more hesitant on the religious claims -Or wonder about what kind of special training she received -Or perhaps its absolute pure, sheer talent, Fraud (skeptics) -Some might even question whether Akiane was the one who really painted it -Nobody really has evidence to validly discredit her feat though. So, if you meet anyone you think is uninteresting, you must have got it wrong. We leave the brain-hurting world of mathematics, but alas we enter the even more cortex-boggling world of quantum physics. There was an interview with Akiane, and her explanation of how she painted it was that she saw the face of Jesus Christ in her visions. 3- A photograph of an object is ok. The TOK exhibition is based on three objects which should allow you to demonstrate how TOK manifests itself in the real world. I have difficulties coming up with There is nothing on the exhibition rubric that requires a personal connection. Click here to review the details. Basically vertasiums video about how we can't predict the future, the theory goes scientist first said that because of quantam mechanics if we know the position and etc of a particle we can predict with high accuracy where the particle will be in the future in spacetime. A globe, belonging to the student or their family, or to the school, or a similar model of the Earth would seem to be a token of the same type as mentioned in the Guide: A basketball used by the student during their physical education lessons (p.42). This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Thus, (i) what particular knowledge issue in the IA prompt does this object rather than any other, similar, object illuminate, and what does it contribute to the understanding of this knowledge issue? This is similar, but not the same as the observer effect in experimentation where there are some experiments whose outcomes change depending on how they are observed. That is so wrong and one of the key discoveries along the way to showing that was Heisenbergs uncertainty principle. In summary, the theorem shows that you cant prove mathematics consistent using just mathematics (youd have to use a meta-language). Your exhibition should explore either the core theme or one of the optional themes. These include the TOK Subject Guide (for the 2022 syllabus) where youll find the IA prompts, and the exhibition rubric and the exemplar TOK exhibitions (found in MyIB, which is accessible to teachers). An example experiment would be to test whether an animal recognizes itself in a mirror. According to some theories, there exist levels of consciousness3 that we are able to measure. There is no problem provided that as part of good academic honesty practice the provenance is stated, that, if the object was made together with others their permission is given for it to be so used by only one of their number, and that credit is given where it is due. It will be equally likely for someone to believe that this idea is a part of our world, as for another to claim that it is just a thought. Instead, I am repeating a knowledge claim told to me. Can new knowledge change established values or beliefs? Okay, how many real numbers are there? There are, but they are few and far between: p.42 of the Guide tells us that the objects chosen may be objects that the student has created themselves, but they must be pre-existing objects rather than objects created specifically for the purposes of the exhibition. For example, students could include a photograph of an object, such as a historical treaty, where it would not be practical/possible for them to exhibit the physical object. Similarly, a poem is written by a specific author and/or is studied (for example, in the context of a Diploma Literature course in which case, the anthology that containings it could be the object) at a specific place and time. My friend who is a Virgo did not see any of the future forecast true as per astrology predictions, yet she genuinely and regularly looks for horoscope speculations every week. So far, weve described things we know to be unknowable (if that makes sense). There are two answers to this question. ; and (ii) if students choose to spend some of the 950 words providing a brief, summative tying together of the objects as a collection, what conclusion might be reached regarding the IA prompt as a result of considering the collective insights yielded by the three objects as a collection? It makes sense, becomes an object, in the context of a particular discussion, or debate, and it would be expected that the student contextualises it thus. A concept like Godel's Incompleteness Theorem or digits of pi is a go-to but it really depends on your ToK teacher if he/she counts this as an object for exhibition. If true, my ways of It is a pure pseudo-science and knowledge claims about it are relatively untestable. Create an account to follow your favorite communities and start taking part in conversations. This reasoning however is flawed, as it is possible to invent countless antigods, for whom the consequences are exactly opposite, cancelling out the infinities. It was normal for people to think that way, as we tend to simplify matters. The TOK exhibition requires students to write not more than 950 words on the three TOK exhibition objects . Whats crazy about it (actually, one of a few things), is that there is a different constant for each program, so there is an infinite number of values for this constant which is usually shown as a Greek omega (). This subreddit encourages questions, constructive feedback, and the sharing of knowledge and resources among IB students, alumni, and teachers. Neither the Guide nor the Teacher Support Material makes specific mention that the three objects should be of distinct types. The other slightly crazy thing about it is that its not possible to determine what is its an uncomputable number, which is a real shame if we could compute , then its been shown that most unproven problems in mathematics could actually be proved (or disproved). The Teacher Support Material offers the following advice: Students are encouraged to select objects that have personal relevance or that link to areas of personal interest. The assessment instrument for the Exhibition places great emphasis on the specific real-world contexts (Guide p.47) of the objects chosen. He thought up the concept of a general purpose computing machine (now called a Turing Machine) as a thought experiment he didnt envision someone actually building one. This is why I mentioned that perhaps the safety first approach of insisting upon the use of physical objects might be best for the first cohort of students, until we have seen comments from moderators and the publication of the first Subject Report, which may offer further clarification regarding what does, and does not, count as an object. The new TOK curriculum, TOK 2022 has the externally assessed task, the TOK essay worth 67%, and the internally assessed new task, the TOK exhibition worth 33% of the grades. His history proves that even though we consider many things unknowable, they are just simply not yet discovered. If we invent a hypothetical entity, define it as supernatural and claim that it is impossible to prove its existence by mere humans, it can become something unknowable. His idea was strongly related to the 2008 market crash that surprised most of the economists and later was tried to be rationalized. Because you can never verify that something has existed for eternity, it is literally impossible to verify that. Why would we argue that the nature of alien life is unknowable. Placing a cat in a sealed box with an instrument designed to have an exact 50% probability to kill the animal, is a part of a famous thought experiment designed by Erwin Schrdinger1. The problem is that although youre happy to write an infinite number of programs, that infinity is way smaller than the infinite number of real numbers, so there must be many (in fact, most) real numbers missing that cant be calculated. Change). He was born Alfred Teitelbaum in 1901. This will ensure the originality of your exhibition. TOK Exhibition- Are some things unknowable. It's just not possible to ever receive an answer Continue Reading More answers below It is, therefore, important that students identify specific objects to discuss rather than using generic objects and generic images (p.42). There are lots of things we dont know; personally Im a veritable cornucopia of ignorance. This is another mind bender proved by Alan Turing. Maybe. Your exhibition should explore either the core theme or one of the optional themes. Thus, it may be a creation for a Visual Arts, or Design Technology class, or a model created for one of the Group 4 subjects or the Group 4 Project, or even something made as part of a CAS project. Any thoughts, comments, suggestions, or general feedback would be very much appreciated! Any object you pick must be specific and personal to you. This way with sufficient information, predicting the future would be possible, but all experiments suggest that the universe isnt deterministic. Become a member of the site and make TOK amazing HERE. Enjoy access to millions of ebooks, audiobooks, magazines, and more from Scribd. Are some things unknowable? My teacher said its fine, but Ive been looking at examples on the Internet and Im beginning to feel anxious that mine arent unique enough plus the draft is also due in two days aAaaAhHH. The TOK exhibition object 3 is a case of our knowledge about astrology. Real world context - perspectives There are many ways in which people can view this. For some people, however, their belief is enough evidence to make the existence of their god a fact. All that said, this might be one of those opportunities for an informal discussion, either with individual students or the entire class or cohort, regarding the nature of academic honesty. I create my own assignments, essays, and the exhibition and show you how the course really works. A photograph of a museum exhibit, such as a historical treaty, where it would not be practical/possible for them to exhibit the physical object (IBID.) The knowledge about the future is uncertain, requires justification, could be bias, has limitations and many other things. This can help to provide an accessible starting point for students and can provide a focus to help students narrow down their choice of potential objects (Guide pp.3940). Architecture is a practice, a concept, an area of knowledge for want of a better phrase (substitute architecture for economics, or chemistry or literature and it becomes clearer). When I learnt the theorem, it was suggested that the famous Fermats Last Theorem might be such a true thing that cant be proved true, but that was spoiled as an example when Andrew Wiles proved it true in 1995. By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. Are there any limitations on the type of item that can be used? The characteristics of black swan and the fact that it is an open system that takes into account many variables that are often not related and change with time randomly make it unknowable. The image above represents pi and infinity which are both mathematical symbols. Such an idea is symbolized by the eye of providence a god that watches over humanity. Our limits of comprehension may result from insufficient technology or lack of prior knowledge in this matter. His work on computing machines was entirely theoretical at first; he was working on the idea of describing mathematical statements entirely numerically so they could be processed by a theoretical computing machine. What features of knowledge have an impact on its reliability? I have not understood the rationale for why an audio piece cannot be an object for the Exhibition. It is assessed internally, that is by your own teachers, but moderated externally by IB examiners. tok/ee hi! Why might that be UNKNOWABLE (as opposed to unknown). 21. The assessment instrument for the IA task mentions two criteria (in the 910 mark band) which give us some insight into what this unpacking might look like. Well done. Basically vertasiums video about how we can't predict the future, the theory goes scientist first said that because of quantam mechanics if we know the position and etc of a particle we can predict with high accuracy where the particle will be in the future in spacetime. He has two categories: Things as they appear to us through the mediation of our sense, or in other words, empirical reality, and noumena, things as they actually are in an unknowable objective reality. Other than physics/maths approaches there would be historical/religious approaches. You count each program; the first one is 1, the second, 2 and so on as youre counting, you use the positive, whole numbers. [With Downloads!] 3. So S is continually hopping in and out of itself. My prompt: Are some things unknowable?DOWNLOAD YOUR FREE TOK PACKET (THIS NEW ADDRESS WORKS)http://www.getanaintok.com/freestuffTOK Essay Tutoringhttps://www.fiverr.com/share/NEAQ6VTOK Exhibition Tutoring:https://www.fiverr.com/share/V7AB8BGet a great score in the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme by scoring as high as you can in Theory of Knowledge!

Why Are There No Waves In The Caribbean, Jasmine Nguyen And Pranav, Wagh Bakri Masala Chai Caffeine, Articles A

are some things unknowable tok objects